New Special Education Mandate On Governor Cuomo's Desk
On the heels of reams of unfunded state mandates that demand that our public schools become parent, cop, nursemaid, chauffeur, shrink, social worker, nutritionist, physician, personal trainer, godfather, and .... oh yeah, teacher to our kids -- all mandated within the tightening, unforgiving stranglehold of the 2% property tax cap -- comes a hyper-focused special interest ditty that easily passed both houses of the legislature in Albany and awaits Governor Cuomo's signature.
At the very end of the legislative session in June, Brooklyn Assemblywoman Helene Weinstein and Long Island Senator John Flanagan (chair of the Education Committee) slipped in a bill requiring (read mandate) that a school district's Committee on Special Education consider "home environment and family background" when deciding whether to place a special education student in the public school or in a private school.
The bill was so inconspicuously jammed in with hundreds of other bills at the end of the legislative session in June that Senator Suzi Oppenheimer, the ranking, senior Democrat of the Education Committee mistakenly voted for it and is now trying to convince the Governor to veto the bill.
As misbegotten as this bill is from a policy standpoint (where research favors in-school 
placements), the budget ramifications to school districts could be much more draconian. Speculation swirls that this was a special interest sop to the orthodox Jewish community and the Catholic school lobby, giving families massive new leverage in getting their special education student placements paid for by the taxpayer. But remember that 2% tax cap? Let's say a district outside NYC (because the tax cap doesn't affect NYC) gets saddled with out-placing 6 special education students due to the new mandate -- costing a district hundreds of thousands of dollars -- and that additional cost is not exempt from the tax cap. The funds have to come somewhere. You can't reasonably plan and budget for this. Now districts will have to choose which non-mandated programs to eliminate. Assemblywoman Weinstein admitted that in devising this bill cost was not a factor --and that savings would be realized from expediting decision-making after parent appeals.
She can't be serious!
And Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver flat out said that he didn't even consider the cost..."We honestly don't believe that it's going to cost the school districts any more than is appropriate, than what's intended."
Really?
More and more, parents are unilaterally placing their children in non-public schools, paying for it and then lawyering up and fighting districts to retro-actively jam through the approval so that the taxpayer foots the bill without allowing the district to truly consider the appropriateness of the placement. School districts (and therefore taxpayers) have no control over these placements, and the costs for one student's placement out-of-district could, according to the Wall Street Journal , exceed $80,000 annually. It's also likely that this bill runs afoul of federal law -- so enactment of this bill will provoke an avalanche of litigation.
With the advent of the 2% tax cap, we already see a divide brewing between special education advocates and those public school stakeholders who are fighting to keep general education offerings, like AP or IB, like music and arts, like full-day kindergarten.
This breach is bound to get a lot worse.
Note to Assemblywoman Weinstein, Senator Flanagan, and Speaker Silver -- and all legislators who voted for this bill: if you really believe this is good policy (segregating special education students in private placements and having districts pay exorbitantly for that), then offer to pay for it. And when these and other legislators claim that they are working to stop and roll back unfunded mandates, don't believe them.
They're not.
Governor Cuomo, please veto this bill.
[Note: All Westchester members of the Assembly voted against this bill – kudos to them. The Senate vote was another matter, in addition to Suzi Oppenheimer, Senators Jeff Klein, Ruth Hasssell Thomson, and David Carlucci voted for the bill. Locally only Senator Andrea Stewart Cousins voted no – kudos to her. ]
David A. Singer is a former political consultant/campaign professional and political junkie currently toiling as a lawyer in Westchester and managing real estate and media investments.
Subscribe to this comment's feed
written by What about the kids?, July 20, 2012
Hey Edgemonter, from what I have read about your school district, especially on your school district’s website, your district has a good RTI and SPED program. Congratulations!
-
- -1
-
-
written by Calvin, July 12, 2012
-
- +1
-
-
written by Edgemonter Too, July 09, 2012
-
- +0
-
-
written by Jerry G., July 05, 2012
-
- +0
-
-
written by Been There, July 05, 2012
I have not read the bill only press reports but as the father of a special ed young adult who has spent many years in the special education system, this is my take.
You have to have to be a classified special education student with an IEP (Individual Education Plan) which is developed by the school's Committee on Special Education and the parents. Mainstream students do not qualify.
This bill would allow parents to place their children in private school programs and gain tuition reimbursement from the district, even if the program is not approved by the local Committee on Special Education or by the NYS Department of Education.
So, if a family has strict vegetarian or wiccan beliefs and has a child in special education the school district can be forced to place it in a private program that promotes vegetarianism and wiccanism, even though the program is not approved by the NYS Dept of Education. The notion of "best educational program" and "least restrictive environment", the two driving forces of out of district placements takes a back seat.
This bill just leaves my speechless and does a major disservice to the special education community.
I am not surprised that this came from the pudd'nheads in Albany.
-
- +4
-
-
written by Edgemonter, July 05, 2012
Thanks in advance for the explanation!
-
- +0
-
-
You totally miss the point of this bill. The current environment does not stop parents from placing special needs children in the most appropriate, least restrictive and ideally the "best" education environment for their kids. Unfortunately districts don't always do the right thing because of the costs involved. If the Federal government ever gets around to funding IDEA the way it was initially intended back in the 1990s, this would not be so large an issue. Special Ed parents are currently forced to hire lawyers to make sure their children are treated fairly and do not become pawns of the district budget process. This is expensive and time consuming process not only for the parents but also the districts. I know because our family has been the victim of the system.
This bill does absolutely nothing about that. It deals with a totally different situation. What is happening here is that some parents want to be able to place their special needs kids in programs that fit their cultural needs even though those programs are not certified by the State Education Department and may provide an inferior education experience.
Let me give you an example. I am a strong believer in a flat earth and I only associate with other flat earthers. I want my child to go to a special education school that promotes and adheres to flat earth beliefs. This bill would mandate that as my flat earth beliefs would be the primary consideration in placing my child in a special needs program The child's home school district would have to pay for the flat earth school even though it does not meet the basic special education tenants of least restrictive and best education environment. The flat earth school would not have to be certified by NYSED, it could be run by total incompetents.