Friday, Oct 19th

Last updateThu, 18 Oct 2018 9pm

You are here: Home Content On Our Radar Addressing the Lawsuit Against the Village of Scarsdale and Scarsdale Police Department
first
  
last
 
 
start
stop
50 Years Later: The SHS Class of 1968 Returns for a Memorable Reunion

50 Years Later: The SHS Class of 1968 Returns for a Memorable Reunion

They came from as far as Switzerland and San Diego and as near as E...

Deb Pekarek to Chair Scarsdale Bowl Committee

Deb Pekarek to Chair Scarsdale Bowl Committee

Deb Pekarek has been named Chair of the 2019 Scarsdale Bowl Committ...

Scarsdale Girls Varsity Swim and Dive Team's Historic Season

Scarsdale Girls Varsity Swim and Dive Team's Historic Season

The Scarsdale Girls Varsity Swim & Dive team has followed up la...

St. James the Less Hosts Graveyard Tour and Halloween Party

St. James the Less Hosts Graveyard Tour and Halloween Party

The ghosts will haunt the graveyard at the Church of St. James the ...

first
  
last
 
 
start
stop

Addressing the Lawsuit Against the Village of Scarsdale and Scarsdale Police Department

podiumThe following remarks were given at the Board of Trustee meeting on February 13, 2018. The comments are the personal views of Ron Schulhof.

I would like to talk tonight about the recent lawsuit filed by Robert Berg against the Village of Scarsdale and the Scarsdale Police Department over lawn signs. I'm not going to opine on whether lawn signs are good or bad or the legality of this issue, but rather HOW this issue was addressed. I think it's important to address this situation because how we do things as a community matters.

When I first heard that someone sued our police department over this issue I was shocked and dismayed because the placement of lawn signs is an issue that could have been brought up and resolved in a constructive and open manner. This issue could have been handled without making it political and without litigation.

The issue in question is a section of our Village code. Village code can be changed and certainly can be done without needing a lawsuit to change it. The lawsuit states that the suing party believed there was an issue with lawn signs almost a year ago! This means that anytime over the last year this issue could have been brought up and we could have addressed this as a community. Anytime over the last many months would have been the time to jump into action. This would have given an opportunity for anyone who wanted to be involved to get informed and voice their opinion. Change could have been made in a way that was open, collaborative and constructive.

Why do it this way - in a last minute, aggressive and litigious manner. Everybody should consider for themselves the potential motives for the situation being handled in this way. My personal view, it was simply laziness. Doing it right would have likely taken much more work. It would have been a lot of work to bring this up months ago and work collaboratively with the Village, Board and Community. It would have taken effort and time to discuss the issue and all the relevant points - legal and otherwise. Time which we would have had, since it wouldn't have been done in the last minute. It would have been worth it! Giving others in the community a chance to voice their views and thoughts and work through this issue. If there is concern that this isn't how things happen in Scarsdale or if there is a concern with the process of how code changes happen, then this could have been a shining example of how to do it better. How we do things matters.

If this had been done in a timely and constructive way, our police chief wouldn't be faced with possibly spending his time in a deposition room. Our Village wouldn't need to spend money and resources to respond in court. The community, as a whole, could have been involved in the discussion. Whatever your view on this issue, we should strive to make sure everyone has an opportunity to be involved in such important issues. Instead, the discussion is now centered around a lawsuit.

We work through many issues and proposals here - and one of the great things about our community is how we work through them with an open dialogue and collaboratively. I have personally brought many proposals before the Board and the community feedback we receive always makes them better. Scarsdale is a great place to live. Lawsuits are not what makes Scarsdale great.

Our Village now may end up spending time, money and resources in the legal system because of this lawsuit. So we're here now - what can we do? I would urge members of our community to consider sending a note of support to our Police Department. I personally sent them one this weekend. I think it's important we let our Police Department know the actions of one individual, in suing them in this manner, do not represent who we are as a community. The Police Department is not some faceless organization. We are a small town and our officers are part of this community; suing our police department over an issue that could have been handled otherwise is not an action of appreciation or respect for our police department and the officers that work hard every day for this community. Actions matter.

Going forward, we can simply be better than using lawsuits when there are other options available. While we can't control the actions of one person, the rest of us can do the hard work, the detailed work, the unglamorous work, in a manner that continues to make Scarsdale a fantastic place.

Ron Schulhof
February 13, 2018

Disclosure Statement: I am a member of the following Village and Civic organizations: Citizens Nominating Committee, Scarsdale Citizens Non-Partisan Party, Conservation Advisory Council (Chair), LED Streetlight Committee (Chair), Food Scrap Recycling Committee, Scarsdale Forum chilepepper(Board of Directors). The comments are my own personal views.

Want to post a comment? Please include your REAL name and street address.

BLOG COMMENTS POWERED BY DISQUS

Comments   

#3 Bob Selvaggio 2018-02-16 15:34
I could not disagree with you more, Mr. Schulhof.

Mr. Berg’s victory (Scarsdale’s victory) was much more than “a lawsuit over lawn signs” – it was rather an appeal to a federal judge to restore our citizens’ rights under the first and fourteenth amendments to the US Constitution. These are among the basic freedoms Americans have fought and died for, yet our Village Board showed no inclination to halt the illegal infringement of these rights. It took a private citizen to secure these for us once again, and he did so in an appropriately expeditious manner.

Our civil liberties should not be trampled upon for even a minute, let alone for the time you would have preferred we waste debating whether or not to protect those rights.

As for our police officers, do you really think that professionals who spend their careers enforcing the rule of law want to enforce illegal edicts? Do you seriously believe that any of our men and women in blue have actually wanted to confiscate lawn signs from private property and face the angry homeowners whose rights were being denied? Give me a break.

Scarsdale is much the better and much the stronger for having our civil liberties – those guaranteed to us by the US Constitution -- restored.

Bob Selvaggio
16 Rochambeau Road
Quote
#2 S. Kitcharayot 2018-02-16 11:56
Being a member of so many of those Village and Civic organizations, why did you not do something about this unconstitutiona l ordinance? Was simply laziness (at best) or could it have been that you were against the positions posted?

I agree everybody should consider the potential motives for the COMPLETE situation.

I also find it interesting how you did not opine on the legality of the issue and instead took to character assassination and making assumptions. Are your assumptions of Mr. Berg’s laziness more important than constitutional rights?

BTW, last year one of my signs was removed and it was well within my property.
Quote
#1 Michele Braun 2018-02-14 18:54
Many yards across Scarsdale are full of signs for Scarsdale Raiders, for contractors, for tag sales, to name a few -- that for some reason have been permitted and continue to be permitted in this "right of way." To ask police to remove signs that support one side (as alleged) or the other side in a recent public debate demonstrates selective enforcement and an inappropriate use of public resources (police salaries). If this is the response of public officials to constitutionall y protected speech, I worry about what our kids learn in the local schools and how that fits with "support" for equal access and free speech demonstrated in our community.
Quote

Add comment

Security code
Refresh

Good Work

SETTING

Deb Pekarek to Chair Scarsdale Bowl Committee

Deb Pekarek to Chair Scarsdale Bowl Committee

Deb Pekarek has been named Chair of the 2019 Scarsdale Bowl Committee. Randy Guggenheimer, President of the Scarsdale Foundation, announc...

Read More

Around Town

SETTING

Neighborhood News

SETTING

On Our Minds

SETTING

Emergency Preparedness Drill on Thursday Night October 18

Emergency Preparedness Drill on Thursday Night October 18

Don't be alarmed if you see lots of emergency vehicles in the area on Thursday night between 7 and 10 pm.

The Scarsdale Police and Fire De...

Read More

On Our Radar

SETTING

Parenting

SETTING

St. James the Less Hosts Graveyard Tour and Halloween Party

St. James the Less Hosts Graveyard Tour and Halloween Party

The ghosts will haunt the graveyard at the Church of St. James the Less on Sunday evening, October 28th, beginning at 6:00pm. However, Mo...

Read More

Village Voices

SETTING

School News

SETTING

Schools

SETTING

Streaking Girls Varsity A Soccer Team Heads to Section 1 Playoffs

Streaking Girls Varsity A Soccer Team Heads to Section 1 Playoffs

The Raiders celebrate on the field after their dramatic overtime win against Mamaroneck. The Scarsdale High School Girls Varsity A soccer ...

Read More

The Goods

SETTING

50 Years Later: The SHS Class of 1968 Returns for a Memorable Reunion

50 Years Later: The SHS Class of 1968 Returns for a Memorable Reunion

They came from as far as Switzerland and San Diego and as near as Edgewood and Edgemont to remember their high school years, which for so...

Read More

Real Estate

SETTING

People

SETTING

Rabbi Lester B. Bronstein Named President of the New York Board of Rabbis

Rabbi Lester B. Bronstein Named President of the New York Board of Rabbis

Bet Am Shalom synagogue announced that its spiritual leader, Rabbi Lester B. Bronstein, has been named the new president of the New York ...

Read More

first
  
last
 
 
start
stop

Programs for Scarsdale Kids