Monday, Dec 18th

Last updateMon, 18 Dec 2017 12pm

You are here: Home Schools Scarsdale Schools Registrar Enforces Strict New Residency Requirements

Scarsdale Schools Registrar Enforces Strict New Residency Requirements

who-lives-here.jpgAt the end of the 2016 school year the Board of Education adopted new rules concerning registration of students in the district. Policy 5152, title "Admission of Non-Resident Students," was debated at length by the Board of Education and the Superintendent because it stipulated the conditions under which residents, who were moving into and out of the district or renovating their homes, would be required to pay tuition to have their children remain in school.

This enforcement of this new set of rules came as a surprise to new and existing residents as well as some realtors who found that if their clients were not in their homes by the start of the school year, they would be required to pay a full year of tuition.

At the same time, parents who were separated or divorced received inquiries from the District Registrar about their domestic and custodial arrangements.

Why this change? In the March 16th issue of the 'Dale Dispatch' Scarsdale Schools Superintendent Thomas Hagerman provided the following explanation for the new policy. He said, "Another aspect of this centralization of registration that has gotten some attention from the community is the verification of residency that is required when families move, have outdated leases or other paperwork, or have disruptions in family life such as divorce or separation. Although many people believe that owning or renting a property in Scarsdale is sufficient for school attendance, New York law dictates that physical residency is actually the standard, so this does need to be confirmed, sometimes along with custodial arrangements. While we understand this can seem intrusive, particularly to families in transition, we do have an obligation both legally and to our taxpayers, to ensure that students in our schools live in Scarsdale .... Unfortunately, there are more nonconforming residency situations than most people realize, representing thousands of dollars of cost to the families and taxpayers of Scarsdale."

Separated and Divorced Parents

Helen Morey, a Heathcote resident and mother of two school-age boys, grew alarmed, when shorty before the Christmas holiday in December, she received a letter from the district demanding verification of her custody arrangements within four days. In her own words, here are her thoughts on the actions of the district.

"After receiving a demand letter from the Scarsdale Superintendent to provide my entire divorce decree within the 5 business days before Christmas, 2016, else be subject to 'a full investigation', I contacted the office. After much argument back and forth, Dr. Hagerman finally and formally accepted a signed affidavit of custody sufficient to preserve my children's Scarsdale residency and attendance in the Scarsdale School District.

Subsequently, I contacted several individuals across the NY State Board of Education and related Albany offices and found that Scarsdale schools are not following several legal protocols designed to protect students and families, including:

1. Posting the complete list of documents and criteria publicly (on the web site, etc.) to prove residency in the case of new residents, relocating within the village residents, or divorcing residents.

2. School districts are explicitly NOT permitted to require submission of a judicial custody order or order of guardianship - the exact document that Dr. Hagerman's office initially demands and prefers. Only an affidavit is legally allowed.

3. While school districts have the individual right to charge tuition and a requirement to make a determination within 4 business days, school districts do NOT have the right to demand the tuition be paid in full within those same 4 days else threaten to remove a child from school such as happens here in Scarsdale. In fact, the findings have a 4 day window and following that school districts must publish and adhere to the state laws regarding a contested finding, only at the conclusion of which could tuition be demanded should the district succeed in it's decision and motion.

Lastly, it seems odd that the role of a district superintendent should be so consumed with the pursuit of residency proof, including the hiring and management of a private detective force. I would like to understand from the Scarsdale Board of Education what the specific remit is for the office that would make such work the focus at the expense of further improving and streamlining our school system."

Newcomers to Scarsdale

While it used to be enough to have a contract of sale to enroll children in school in the summer, for those moving in after the first day of school, the district is now requiring proof of the house closing and of residency.

Here is the new rule:

A child whose parents have contracted to buy or leased an apartment, house or condominium in the District, but have not moved into the District, may attend the school of the District for up to three months, upon the payment of tuition.

A mother of three children who moved here from California in the late summer had a contract of sale but was not able to actually move in to her house until September 30th. In order to enroll, the district required the family to pay an entire year of tuition for each of the children up front, with the promise of a pro-rata refund upon closing. This was a considerable hardship for the family who had just used up their resources to purchase a house. But that was not all. Even when they had closed the district sought to verify that they were in the house. The woman was outraged when a representative from the district appeared at her door to inspect the house to confirm that they had actually moved in. When there did not appear to be sufficient furniture on the first floor, she demanded that she be allowed upstairs to check the beds. The resident found this level of intrusion objectionable and refused the request.

Moving Out While Renovating

Another new provision, specific to Scarsdale, that residents should keep in mind pertains to temporarily moving out of your home while it is under renovation.

Here is what the regulation says:

A students whose parents own a house in the District which is unoccupied, may be permitted to attend the schools of the District, without the payment of tuition, for up to one academic year from the date that the house became unoccupied, under the following conditions:

a. The house had been occupied, and resided in, but the student and parents for the three years directly prior to the house become unoccupied and the house is required to be unoccupied for a major home construction or remodeling, and

b. The student's parents continue to own the house throughout the period that the house is unoccupied and do not purchase another residential property.

Therefore, this means that if you decide to renovate a home, and have not already lived there for three years prior to the renovation, you will need to pay tuition while you are out of the house. Both residents and realtors find this new regulation puzzling, as the homeowners are presumably paying real estate taxes on the home that is under renovation, have a valid Scarsdale address and ought to be permitted to send their children to school.

Commenting on the new policies, Anne Moretti, Associate Real Estate Broker with Julia B. Fee Sotheby's said, "The District's new residency requirements need to be more clearly defined and enforcement more carefully handled. Incoming homebuyers with signed purchase contracts should also have some grace period within which they can move in without paying tuition. The District should answer the questions Joanne has outlined in this article, and the community should be better informed on our policies."

We sent Dr. Hagerman a series of questions about this new policy a few weeks ago but have not received a response.

Specifically, here is what we asked the Superintendent:

-In your note in the Dale Dispatch you said, "There are more nonconforming residency situations than most people realize, representing thousands of dollars of cost to the families and taxpayers of Scarsdale."

-Can you tell us how many non-conforming students you found in the schools last year before you instituted the new policy? At what cost to the district?

-The policy for current residents who move out of their home while it is being renovated says that in order not to pay tuition they had to own the home for three years directly prior to the house becoming unoccupied. Why the three year requirement?

-Some divorced parents with joint custody have said that the district requires their children to live at the Scarsdale address for a certain percentage of time in order to attend the schools. Can you elaborate? Is this district or state policy?

-Does the district require divorced parents to provide the district with their divorce agreements and custodial arrangements?

-A few parents have reported that the district has retained private investigators to verify residency in the district. Is that true? If so, what was the cost of that so far this school year?

-In reviewing residency requirements for districts in our area, is the new policy in Scarsdale similar to what you see? Does the district have some discretion on how the law is interpreted?

When we receive responses to the questions we will share them with you. In the interim, we thought it would be helpful to make you aware of these new regulations so that you will not be caught by surprise if your own situation changes.

What do you think of these new policies?

Please comment below and include your first and last names.


-10 #24 Resident paying for District employees kids 2017-04-29 15:06
It's ironic that the rude "District Employee" (whose name has since been removed) can send her children to Scarsdale Schools for free, but she challenges tax paying residents ability to send their own children to the school district they pay taxes to. Anyone ever wonder why we are letting the superintendent' s secretary and custodians kids attend Scarsdale schools on our tax payments?
+5 #23 For Joanne 2017-04-28 21:02
Joanne, did Dr. Hagerman ever respond to your questions? Thank you for reporting on this issue.
+21 #22 Judgment and Perspective? 2017-04-28 14:43
The school board is remiss in allowing their policy to be implemented in such a destructive way. How did the superintendent come up with his regulations? With whom did he consult? And why wasn't the community informed? The superintendent appears to lack judgment and perspective and it's time for the Board to show leadership.
+23 #21 Warner Jeannette 2017-04-28 05:08
I also had a run in with (the district) when my ex-husband changed his address. While I remained in the same home which we purchased in 2002, the board employee demanded that I give to her the entire document which establishes the custody agreement which is in our instance the separation agreement. She was unpleasant boarding on rude, and refused to allow me to discuss with the school board attorney the school board's requirement. She further misconstrued the legal requirements for establishing rights for divorced/separa ted parents. Only after I suggested that it appeared I would have to commence legal action regarding their action did she agree to accept my affidavit of custody. Thank you for your thorough investigation of their practice. It is outrageous how the district is bullying the citizens and demanding production of the most personal legal documents when there are clearly less instructive proof available to establish rights to enroll students in our school system.
+27 #20 Divorced Parent 2017-04-27 22:11
I had a terrible time this year when I tried to change my family address in the District directory following a move from one house to another within Scarsdale. I am a divorced parent and both my former husband and I have owned separate homes in Scarsdale for nearly 10 years (between which my children go back and forth on an equal basis). When I sold my house and purchased another across town, I assumed I simply needed to update my new mailing address in my childrens' school directories. Despite the fact that my husband's Scarsdale home-address was not changing even when I was moving from one home to another (and I had no gap in Village residency between my own two homes), my request prompted an offensive and aggressive barrage of emails and official letters from a rude woman working in the District Office who demanded invasive levels of proof of my home ownership (including my moving dates, closing documents for both my old and new homes, etc., all of which are already on file at Village Hall). (The district employee)even copied the principals and counselors at all my childrens' schools on letters that announced my children would be "disenrolled" from their schools if I didn't respond to her unreasonably demands within 24 hours. When I pointed out to her that, even she had some basis to need to verify my move within the Village (she did not), my kids' dad was a full-time Village homeowner/resid ent, so their enrollment status should not be affected, she offensively stated that it didn't matter because the District assumed that a mother's residence was the children's "primary home" and a father's residence "didn't matter" unless we had some sort of "unusual" divorce arrangement. Her assumptions and demands were unfounded, insulting and illegal, and the District has serious legal exposure if this practice is continuing.
-7 #19 What is a legal guardian? 2017-04-27 21:57
If an overseas family rents an apartment in Scarsdale and pays someone in that building to be the guardian for that child while the parents remain overseas, is this legal?
+4 #18 Ms. B 2017-04-26 22:07
When I registered my 3 children this past year and we were coming from out of state, I found the process quite easy and humane. The registrar was incredibly sweet and helpful throughout the process and answered a million questions we had. It sounds like a completely different school district people are talking about here.
+18 #17 Charles S. 2017-04-26 12:57
I gotta laugh at the comments about freeloading families with 10 children. I know a lot of people in Scarsdale, but I have yet to meet these phantom freeloaders. I think the policy is a revenue-making tool, plain and simple. A family who lives in Scarsdale, pays taxes in Scarsdale, and has children who are school age in Scarsdale should never have to pay tuition. Under this policy, they do have to pay if their house is not move-in ready by the start of the school year. Bad policy!
-6 #16 Jenny WP 2017-04-26 12:50
Jenny--you weren't treated doubt.

You and your family were honest, well-intended people, willing to pay your share of our property taxes to fund your kid's education here.

I am sorry you were treated the way you were. But where I may take issue is in where you assign blame.

This seemingly complex, strict, and strictly enforced set of rules arose from people who got together (not necessarily even a family) in a good school community (it need not be Scarsdale) with 3 bedrooms, and take money illegally to viola, have "10 children as their guardians" who have nothing to do with them, all while on paper, their income appears so low, they don't pay much in taxes, while us honest people foot their bill en mass..

Blame them, not the school district who is trying to keep your education costs as low as possible by not allowing such cheats to enter the system.

Every rule and law has the possibility of negative consequences in its reduction in freedoms for the innocent, and use by the morally guilty to go free. Churchill said that "democracy is the worst form of government, except for all the others."
+36 #15 Re-read Jenny WP 2017-04-26 11:18
I note many of the comments posted here are riffing on a familiar tune in our public discourse - immigration, abuse of public services etc

But take a second and re-read Jenny WP's note. This is a story of a real family coming to our community for the first time. Is this how we all as Scarsdalians wanted to welcome her? By demanding full payment just days before school started. By threatening to remove her child. And by "inspecting" her home.

Believe me, I'm all in favor of a resident policy for our schools. But reading Jenny WP's note - and hearing the story of others in our community - I am personally outraged at the heavy-handed execution of this policy by this School Administration.

Add comment