Letter to the Editor from Joshua Mitts
- Details
- Written by Joanne Wallenstein
- Category: The Goods
(The following was submitted by Joshua Mitts of Scarsdale)
Opinion: The Eradication of Hamas is a Moral Imperative
I commend Mark Hershey's thoughtful op-ed on Israel published in Scarsdale10583. Israel's moral commitment is deeply rooted in Jewish tradition and Israeli society. Many Americans are unaware just how strongly the IDF holds itself to the highest standards in conducting operations and disciplining its own soldiers. After the tragic attack on the World Central Kitchen convoy, the IDF conducted a swift investigation, fired two officers within days, and committed to a series of reforms. No military is perfect, but few top the IDF's deep commitment to the rule of law.
By contrast, Hamas has committed war crimes and crimes against humanity--first and foremost against the Palestinian people, as well as Israelis. By intentionally using women and children as human shields and cowardly hiding within hospitals, schools and critical infrastructure, Hamas has brought untold suffering upon the people of Gaza. A cease-fire at any cost would reward Hamas for the horrors of October 7 by allowing the terrorist organization to regroup and amass power, crushing any hope for a moderate Palestinian government to emerge in Gaza. As painful as the scenes from Gaza are, we must continue to place the blame squarely on Hamas. For the sake of a better future for the Palestinian people, Israel must destroy Hamas. There is no other moral choice.
Joshua Mitts is David J. Greenwald Professor of Law at Columbia University. He lives in Scarsdale with his wife, Tamar, and two children, Emily and Liam. One month after October 7, Professor Mitts organized a petition to the Village of Scarsdale to permit hostage flyers to be posted in the public right-of-way, which received over 500 signatures. Last month, Professor Mitts hosted a forum at Columbia on "Israel as a Law-Abiding, Liberal Democracy in Wartime" with former Israeli Supreme Court Justice Danziger, former Israeli Attorney General Avichai Mandelblit and other dignitaries in the Israeli legal community. Professor Mitts serves as faculty advisor to the Law Students Against Antisemitism student group at Columbia Law School.
Opinion: Is This A Just War and Is The War Being Fought Justly?
- Details
- Written by Joanne Wallenstein
- Category: The Goods
A post by Bess Kalb on the Grudge Report about the conflict in Israel and Gaza has sparked conversation among local members of the Jewish community. Kalb has some association with the Dale as she attended Scarsdale Middle School, before moving back to the city. You can see her post here:
Below is a response to it from Mark Hershey of Scarsdale.
I think that I understand why Bess Kalb wrote what she did, however, in my opinion, there is much about the Israeli situation, and the inherent nature of armed conflict, that she has failed to understand or acknowledge. As history over the centuries has so clearly demonstrated, war is hell! Every war inevitably brings horror and pain not only to soldiers, but also to innocent civilians caught in the middle of armed conflict. Does Bess think that the British and American armies fighting to liberate Europe in World War II did so without creating equally horrible scenes of dead children, disfigured bodies, and destroyed cities?
In the end, one needs to address two questions: is this a just war, and is the war being fought justly? I believe that this is a just war — a war of self-defense — and I am fully comfortable in saying that it is entirely proper and moral for Israel to be “hell bent on our own survival”. Perhaps Bess, residing in the comfort of her home in America, need not be so concerned about her survival, and so perhaps she cannot easily relate to Israelis who are desperately concerned about their survival. I think that this is the crucial problem with many people in America. We have been too comfortable, too safe, for too long, and we have not lived through an existential war, as our parents did. Many of us simply cannot fathom the cruel fact that when you and your country face destruction or domination by a powerful and murderous foe, as Israel faces today from radical Islam, and has faced almost without interruption for the past 75 years, the only viable and moral response is self-defense, and often that means taking up arms and defending yourself as best you can. And the results are not pretty — in fact, they are cruel and horrible, for your opponents and for your own people.
Is Israel conducting the war justly? While I think that it is entirely appropriate to ask this question and to make such an assessment, I would argue that one needs to do so honestly and fairly, while considering all of the prevailing circumstances. For example, it is fair for Bess to raise challenging questions about the recent terrible tragedy involving the World Kitchen volunteers apparently killed by an Israeli attack. Nonetheless, I find it hard to believe that any Israeli official knowingly ordered the murder of innocent people, which is what some are suggesting. It is much more likely that the attack was a tragic mistake, and that the Israeli officer who approved the attack believed that there were Hamas fighters in these vehicles. Such horrible mistakes happen frequently in all wars. Indeed, many soldiers in combat are killed by “friendly fire.” This does not diminish the tragedy of this or other similar events, but equally, such a tragedy does not make the perpetrator of the event malevolent. The consequences of war are horrible and tragic. None of us, least of all the Israelis, wanted this war, and I challenge Bess or others to show examples of any other wars where one side or the other avoided large civilian casualties, massive destruction and horrible tragedies.
Could Israel do better? I honestly don’t know. I am not standing in their shoes. I am not able to see or know all of the immense pressures that such a conflict imposes on combatants. This is a war where the enemy wears no uniform, embeds itself in hospitals, mosques, schools and apartment buildings, and uses innocent women and children as human shields. Does Bess have a military tactic in mind, or can she point to another similar conflict (if there is one) where an army has successfully defeated its enemy with less human suffering? Naturally, we all would like to think that somehow an army of terrorists can be destroyed or defanged with a minimum of civilian loss of life, but the sad truth is that the Hamas terrorists who initiated this war have opened the gates of hell. One might wish that war could be pursued “humanely”, but history suggests otherwise.
I believe that we who live in comfort and security should not place impossible burdens on those who are fighting for their lives. Having said this, I would agree that Israel should try its best to provide humanitarian aid to Gaza, and to make serious efforts to move civilians out of harms way, if at all possible. I believe that Israel has tried to achieve these ends, but it is fair to ask if they could do more. What is not realistic, in my view, is to assume that such actions would prevent the horrors and tragedies of war, on both sides.
I am fortunate in my life to have never been put in a position of having to decide when or whether to pull the trigger, or press the “kill button”, but equally I have never been the target of an incoming missile, and I have never been confronted by a terrorist holding a machine gun, or a suicidal killer driving a car or carrying an explosive device strapped to their chest. We need to be sympathetic with the innocent victims in Gaza, while also being empathetic to Israelis who are continuously threatened by those who attempt to murder them. We need to remember what it was like for our parents’ generation who faced the most frightening of times and found the courage and resilience to fight an aggressive and murderous enemy, notwithstanding the horrible consequences of that war.
Bess calls for Ceasefire Now and a Hostage Deal Now. Does she mean a Hostage Deal Now at any cost? Should Israel release all Hamas prisoners, including known perpetrators of terror attacks and murders of Israelis? Should the Ceasefire be a permanent ceasefire, leaving a portion of the Hamas military capacity in Rafah intact? Should Israel agree to immediately fully withdraw from Gaza, even if it would mean a return of Hamas control over Gaza? Negotiating for the release of the hostages in the middle of a war is a painful, complex and difficult matter, and only the Israeli War Cabinet and the people of Israel can decide what trade-offs make sense under current circumstances. Surely we in America are in no position to make such decisions, nor should we try to do so.
Mark Hershey and his wife Janet have been residents of Scarsdale since 1980. All four of their sons graduated from Scarsdale High School. The Hershey family have been long time members of Congregation Kol Ami, where Mark served as President (from 1996 to 2000), and remains active. Mark retired in 2022 from HSBC Bank, an international bank based in London, where he held the position of Global Head of Commercial Credit Risk. In retirement, Mark has become active in the American Jewish Committee in Westchester, and the North American and Israeli divisions of the Shalom Hartman Institute, a leading Jewish think tank and educational institution.
Letter to the Editor: Term Limits Are A Hallmark of the Democratic Process
- Details
- Written by Cynthia Roberts
- Category: The Goods
This letter was sent to the Mayor and Scarsdale Board of Trustees by resident Cynthia Roberts:
Dear Mayor Arest and Members of the Board of Trustees,
Many thanks to you all for serving countless hours as volunteers for our community. I listened with great interest to the March 12, 2024 hearing on the proposal to eliminate term limits for the volunteer members of the Board of Architectural Review (BAR) and the Committee on Historic Preservation (CHP) who can currently serve up to two 3-year terms, for a total of six years.
I respectfully write in strong opposition to the proposal to eliminate term limits for the BAR and CHP. Term limits are a hallmark of the democratic process. We must ensure that our positions of power in Scarsdale are open to participation by a resident base that is constantly refreshed with new people and new ideas. Allowing the same persons to stay in power indefinitely serves as a disincentive to resident engagement and sets a dangerous precedent. Scheduled changes of membership, in contrast, enriches these decision-making bodies bringing more diverse perspectives, wisdom and experience.
Your well-intentioned reasons for eliminating term limits include a fear of losing current volunteer members of the BAR and CHP too soon after they have been trained and gained experience. Another rationale you mentioned was addressing the problem of member absence at officially scheduled meetings. Finally, you spoke about the importance of institutional memory.
You know that the first years on the job bring tremendous learning. Yet Trustees stay in office for no more than four years. Our own Mayors serve a maximum of six years on the Board of Trustees. This Trustee turnover helps sustain public trust. Eliminating term limits for the BAR and CHP would mean that members who have already served six full years could serve many more years.
In terms of training, I suggest that volunteers participating in these important governmental roles undergo mandatory training that would at minimum include a review of their statutory mission, all official relevant guidance documents, and all relevant Village codes and procedures. In addition, it would be important for the volunteers to understand the overall land use processes, including the roles of the Planning, Building and Engineering Departments, as well as how the decisions of each volunteer body impacts the other bodies.
Training sessions on Department roles, Village land use procedures and relevant Village codes could be held simultaneously for new members of the Board of Trustees and all other Boards, Councils and Committees where topics are relevant. Sitting members of any body should have the option to attend as a refresher.
You also cited the failure of members to attend official meetings as a rationale for eliminating term limits. If member attendance at meetings is a problem, please deal with this directly. Perhaps the requirement of mandatory attendance at a certain percentage of meetings could be communicated more clearly upfront. This commitment, if violated, could be remedied via a timely meeting of the truant member with body Chair, and if necessary, with the Board of Trustees liaison to that body. Solving an attendance problem by making our system less democratic seems to overshoot the mark.
Finally, the need for maintaining institutional knowledge was also mentioned at the hearing. Institutional knowledge is of great value, and fortunately we have a professional Village staff. There should be a knowledgeable staff person at every BAR meeting who has a comprehensive understanding and familiarity with our Village codes and procedures. This staff member can be called upon to answer questions and can serve as a valuable institutional resource to help these bodies function well.
As you well know, Scarsdale is at a tipping point. The BAR and CHP sit at the epicenter of ongoing struggles that will determine the future physical manifestation of Scarsdale’s values. Our residents have opinions about historic preservation, the aesthetics of our housing stock and neighborhoods, and the significant environmental degradation occurring due to tree loss and unprecedented flooding. To ensure ongoing confidence in our governmental bodies, the public must have confidence that they are both accessible and as democratic in structure as possible.
I urge you not to compromise confidence in our local government. Please maintain our current term limits for the BAR and CHP.
Sincerely yours,
Cynthia Roberts
15 Autenrieth Road
Scarsdale, NY 10583
(Photo Credit: Memorial Garden by Jonathan Mark)
Massapequa Bests Scarsdale in Non-League Lacrosse Game
- Details
- Written by David Taber
- Category: The Goods
Senior Rhett Needleman (25) of Scarsdale shoots and just misses early in the first quarter in Scarsdale’s game against Massapequa on March 30, 2024.On Saturday March 30, Scarsdale played a non-league game against Massapequa at Scarsdale High School’s Butler Field. The game was competitive early on with the Raiders trailing 5-4 at halftime but Massapequa took control in the third quarter and went on to beat Scarsdale 12-5.
Photos by Dave Taber of Shots of the Game
To see more game photos and/or download photos, please visit here.
Scarsdale’s Ben Fromme (20), a senior midfielder, works for open space to get off a shot .
Junior midfielder Anders Burrows (9) of Scarsdale breaks through two Massapequa players which led to a goal in the second quarter of Scarsdale’s game against Massapequa.
Scarsdale’s Anders Burrows (9) celebrates his goal with Leo Wetzstein (2) in Scarsdale’s game against Massapequa.
Scarsdale’s midfielder Thomas Lasiello (24) battles for control of the ball in a face-off.
Junior Thomas Lasiello (24) of Scarsdale gets ready to fire in a long-range shot.
Midfielder Trevor Knopp (15) of Scarsdale looks to make a pass.
Midfielder Rhett Needleman (25) of Scarsdale jumps and fires a tough shot into the net that was ruled “no-goal” by the referee due to interference.
Junior Leo Wetzstein (2), an attacker for Scarsdale takes a shot late in the fourth quarter.
Attacker Jackson Starr (8), a junior from Scarsdale fires on target but the shot was saved by the Massapequa goalie
SFCS Seeks New Board Members
- Details
- Written by Joanne Wallenstein
- Category: The Goods
Are you interested in joining the Board of a non-profit organization right here in Scarsdale? Are you passionate about supporting families and individuals in our community? The Scarsdale Edgemont Family Counseling Service (SFCS) is looking for enthusiastic and dedicated individuals from the Scarsdale/Edgemont community to join our Board of Trustees.
As a Board member, you'll play a vital role in guiding and shaping our organization's mission to be a hub for family growth and learning.
What is SFCS? Scarsdale Edgemont Family Counseling Service is a voluntary, not-for-profit family counseling agency. With over a century of service to the Scarsdale community, SFCS has been a cornerstone, offering counseling services, social programs, and crucial initiatives like our Scarsdale Action for Youth (SAY). In addition to counseling services, the Agency provides social service programs for Scarsdale residents across the life cycle from social skills groups for young children to leadership training programs and adventure trips for teens, to facilitated monthly discussion groups for parents with kids in 5th-12th grades, to aging in place services for older residents.
Why Join Us?
• Make an Impact: Your involvement directly contributes to supporting families at every stage of life.
• Community Engagement: Connect with like-minded individuals dedicated to the betterment of Scarsdale and beyond.
• Personal Growth: Gain valuable experience and insights in nonprofit governance and community leadership.
Who Are We Looking For?
We welcome Scarsdale residents with diverse backgrounds and experiences who are committed to our mission.
How to Apply: Interested in becoming a part of our Board of Trustees? Apply by March 22, 2024 by sending a short email with the following information to SFCSNominatingCommittee@yahoo.com
1. Volunteer/Professional Background
2. Community Experience in Scarsdale/Edgemont
3. Experience with SFCS
Join us in creating positive change in our community! Together, we can make a difference in the lives of Scarsdale families and individuals.
Thanks for your time and consideration.
The SFCS Nominating Committee
