Details

Written by Wendy MacMillan

Published: 16 February 2024

Created: 16 February 2024

Last Updated: 21 February 2024

Hits: 2875

Yes, Valentine’s Day has come and gone but that doesn’t mean that the romance has to go away with it! While gifting your loved one with flowers and chocolates on February 14th is always a good idea, experts say keeping the love alive all year long is essential to a healthy, lasting partnership. According to Marriage.com, “Nurturing and cultivating love throughout the course of a marriage is crucial to its longevity and overall happiness.”

One way the site recommends nurturing your relationship is by making sure to have date nights, saying “It is vital to remember that the courtship is not over once you’re married. To keep your love alive, you should have a date night and see that you make it a priority.”

But as any couple with children knows, finding time for a date night can be more easily said than done. And when you do finally carve out the time and line up a good sitter, many parents don’t have the energy to trek into the Big Apple for a night of romance or adventure. Rest assured, we discovered there is plenty of fun to be had right here in Westchester! We even made planning for your next date night super easy by scouting out these local activities:

-After a delicious dinner at Brasserie Le Steak, or one of the many restaurants in Larchmont, check out a comedy show at the Idea Kitchen. Every 4th Saturday comedian Ben Asher presents a tasting of what the NYC-area's best stand-up comics are cooking up at Comedy From Scratch.

-Try your hand at a round of golf. Yes, even in the deep cold of winter, you and your date can get your game on at indoor golf Try a round of indoor golf.simulators like GolfZon Social or X Golf. In addition to golf lessons, both of these establishments offer food and drink, making them a “one stop” shop for all of your date night fun.

-Think events at our local library are just for kids? Think again! The Scarsdale Public Library offers an array of activities that would be perfect to do with your sweetheart! Upcoming events include author talks, movie screenings, Bingo, and so much more! Check out their full calendar here:

-Do you and your significant other really need to relax and unwind? How about a sound bath with Susie Sands at Pause to be Present? After the calming, hour-long sound bath and meditation, you can stop into one of our village's amazing restaurants!

-Art classes aren’t just for kids! In fact, Muse Paintbar in White Plains offers paint nights specifically for couples aptly called, “Couples Art.” You can even make it a bit more romantic and add a glass of prosecco and some shareable bites from Muse’s in house menu.

-No better way to test your teamwork capabilities than an evening with your partner at The Puzzle Parlor! At this boutique escape room, puzzle solvers have four distinct adventures to choose from…the spooky Vampire Adventure is sure to have you and your loved one sticking close together!

-After you solve the puzzle at the Puzzle Parlor, “escape” on over to White Plains’ very own speakeasy for a craft cocktail and some delicious food. The speakeasy is hidden behind Sweet Temptations Espresso and Dessert Bar at 181 Martine Ave and is perfect for romancing your sweetie.

-Some say you can show someone how much you love them by preparing them a meal. To round out our list of epic date nights, we suggest learning some new cooking tips together! There are a variety of places that host adult cooking classes like Gather Culinary and The Zwilling Cooking Studio.

How does the saying go? Those who play together, stay together? Help keep the spark alive in your relationship and surprise your sweetheart with a fun-filled night on the town! Do you have other ideas for a romantic date night here in Westchester? Leave your suggestions in the comments!

Details

Written by Joanne Wallenstein

Published: 04 March 2024

Created: 04 March 2024

Last Updated: 07 March 2024

Hits: 3141

A team of librarians called The Killer Bees won the bee.14 swarms of 42 brave spellers took the stage at Scarsdale High School on Friday night March 1 to compete in the Friends of the Scarsdale Library Spelling Bee.

Emcee Josh MilsteinBefore the fun began, Library Director Elizabeth Bermel came to the mic and joked, “I can’t believe that it has been four years since I last stood before you to welcome you to the Bee. Good thing not much has happened since then!” She noted all the progress that was made in building and opening the new library and getting through the COVID crisis. She said, “Now, in 2024, I can say that our vision for the Scarsdale Public Library has been realized. The reimagined building is a bustling hub, with programs filling our new spaces, study rooms in constant use, reading areas and work tables occupied at all hours, a thriving cafe, and circulation of physical and electronic materials as strong as ever. It truly is a community destination. Our staff is dedicated, professional, welcoming and helpful, and they are the ones who make the Library “house” a Library “home” for many. I cannot thank them enough for all they do. While we have faced significant challenges these last few years, we have come out the other side stronger and better for it.”

Bermel welecome “esteemed emcee” and SHS Alumni Josh Milstein who read the words to spell from a list supplied by the Friends of the Scarsdale Library. Some of the words were derived from other languages and it was tricky to pronounce them in a way that would give the teams clues to their spelling. As the contest is a single elimination tournament all it took was one wrong letter to knock out a swarm. And as in prior years, the contest went very quickly.

With clever names like “The Bee Gees,” Spellbinder,” and “The Honey Bees,” they took their seats on stage to test their acumen against some of the brightest minds in the burbs. The first round was divided into Swarms A, B, C and D, with the winners of those swarms going on to the final round.

The Bee was judged by Mayor Justin Arest, Assemblymember Amy Paulin and Library Director Beth BermelThe contest was judged by Scarsdale Mayor Justin Arest, Assemblymember Amy Paulin and Library Director Elizabeth Bermel. In the initial rounds, teams were given dry erasure boards to write their words and hold them up. Above them, the word, correctly spelled, would appear on a screen. From the audience it was easy to spot mistakes in an instant.

In the first swarm (or round), all four teams succeeded at correctly spelling:

Oxymoron

Elixir

Enfeeble

Religious

However, the next word, “sacrilegious” tripped up three teams, leaving the “Bee Arthur Manor’ team to go to the final round.

The next swarm was similar. All four teams successfully spelled:

Concede

ParablePrevious winners Seth Ross, Frank Lichtenberg and Randy Guggenheimer were eliminated by the word P-E-L-L-U-C-I-D

Acquit

Croissant

But yet another word derived from French, “Connoisseur” took out “The Bees Knees” and “Don’t Stop Believing.”

The remaining two teams spelled “Curvaceous” correctly. However, the Spellbinders, who had won previous spelling bees, spelled “Pellucid” with one “L’ rather than two, leaving a team of librarians called “The Killer Bees” to go to the finals.

The three teams in Swarm 3 included a group of realtors called “Sellers and Spellers,” along with “Beetlejuice” and library trustees called “Trustbees.”

They all sailed through the spelling of:

HaikuJodi Josephs of "Spellers and Sellers" wowed the audience when she spelled A-N-N-A-T-T-O

Rogue

Abysmal

Paranoia

Pageant

Aphrodisiac

Chauffeur

After everyone misspelled Escritoire, a French writing desk, Milstein said the word “Annatto” which knocked out two teams leaving the realtors to go to the final. FYI, what is Annatto? Wikipedia says it’s “an orange-red condiment and food coloring derived from the seeds of the achiote tree.”

The fourth swarm included three teams of high school students. They all spelled Meme and Feign correctly. One team misspelled “Acrylic” and that swarm was over quickly after “The Beests” left the”C” out of “Lacquer,” leaving “To Bee or Not to Bee” to go on to the final round.

Following intermission and refreshments, “Bee Arthur Manor,” “Killer Bees”, “Spellers and Sellers” and “To Bee or Not to Bee” took the stage for the final round. For this phase, the white boards were put away and one representative from each team had to stand up and spell the word their team was given.

Again, the round went quickly.

Spellers and Sellers were knocked out by the word, “Soapwort,” (which is a wildflower.)

Representatives from the remaining teams successfully spelled:

Buoyant

Camouflage

Egregious

Exaggerate

Pastime

But things came to a quick close when the students misspelled “Hemorrhage” and “Bee Arthur Manor” was knocked out attempting to spell the Italian pasta “Orecchiette.”

That left the team of librarians to spell “Cacophonous,” which high school librarian Liz Waltzman did successfully and her team, which also included Ricki Goe and Nancy Wissman, was declared the winner of the 2024 bee. It was fitting that those who spend their lives with words were able to master the contest.

In between swarms, Trivia Emcee Dara Gruenberg had the crowd stumped with literary questions for both kids and adults.

Gruenberg asked, “What Dr. Seuss character was kind to the environment?” and “Who was Curious George’s friend?” and “What are the names of the two friends in Elena Ferrante’s book, “My Brilliant Friend?” There were answers yelled from the audience and prizes for the ones who got it right.

Leaving the auditorium, you couldn’t help but marvel at the intricacies of the English language, which, despite spellcheck, continues to baffle the best wordsmiths.

Stacey Mayer, Mary Pat Jones and Nancy KaplanThe event was chaired by Mary Pat Jones and Lauren Rubino along with their committee members: Julie Balsam, Jessica Bandel, Colleen Brown, To-Dao Casey, Allison Block, Janet Han, Lori Harrison, Nancy Kaplan, Elyse Klayman, Wendy Kleiman, Rene Lalwani, Michelle Lichtenberg, Mona Longman, Wendy MacMillan, Stacey Mayer, Margot Milberg, Toby Milstein, Alexandra Vargo, Marin Weinberg.

The Friends of the Scarsdale Library wishes to thank their sponsors:

WORKER BEE ($1,000)
Wilson and Son Jewelers
Jim and Mary Pat Jones

BUMBLE BEE ($500)
Zachary and Heather Harrison
Ocean First Bank
Scarsdale Foundation
Scarsdale10583
The Laura Miller Team at Houlihan Lawrence
The Law Office of Dana S. Montone

FLOWER BEE ($250)
Jessica Bandel
Bronx River Books
Buon Amici
Houlihan Lawrence
Nancy and Zack Kaplan
Wendy and Scott Kleinman
La Dentelliere
Renu Lalwani
Michelle and Frank Lichtenberg
Stacey and Adam Mayer
Meritage
Micheline
Margot and Dan Milberg
Once Upon a Lil Cupcake
Sharyl and Gregg Reisman
Lauren and Scott Rubino
Sandbox Theatre
Scoop Shop
The Law Office of Keith Schutzman
Vintology
Janet and Thomas Youm

Photos by Julie Balsam

Details

Written by Joanne Wallenstein

Published: 08 February 2024

Created: 08 February 2024

Last Updated: 08 February 2024

Hits: 1811

A renewed attempt to win approval to take down a treasured home at 27 Woods Lane in Scarsdale was met with a concerted effort by neighbors to save it at an appeals hearing of the Village Board on Tuesday February 6, 2024.

The home was built between 1924 and 1926 and was one of the first in the development called “The Woods,” that featured larger lots than the earlier subdivisions in Edgewood. The home is a centerpiece of the neighborhood of 66 homes and is graciously set back on a .69 acre lot on a curve on the lane, backed by large canopy trees.

The applicants hired attorneys from Cuddy and Feder to appeal to the Scarsdale Village Board to overturn a unanimous decision by the Committee for Historic Preservation to spare the house. The rationale for the decision by the CHP was outlined in a five page memo written by Adam Lindenbaum, Chair of the Committee for Historic Preservation (CHP).

The CHP found that the home meets conditions outlined in the preamble to the Village’s preservation code in that it “contributes to the most important issue in the history and development of Scarsdale, the major suburbanization of the village which large occurred in the second and third decades of the twentieth century.”

In addition, the home maintains integrity of its location, design and setting in a neighborhood where none of the original homes have been razed. A memo from Andrew Dolkart, an architectural historian who spoke at the appeal hearing said, “The original land plat of The Woods was used to define a cohesive neighborhood of architectural significance with distinct boundaries.”

The memo further states that the home “embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period or method of construction that possess high artistic value and that it is “associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the board patterns of Village history.”

The memo refutes the notion that only grand or expensive homes warrant preservation saying, “different types of properties can offer diverse historical narratives. Modest homes for instance can provide valuable insights into the lives of ordinary people, working class family and marginalized communities, contributing to a more comprehensive understanding of history.”

In testimony to the Village Board, attorney Maximillian Mahalek questioned many of the assumptions underlying the CHP decision.

Specifically he noted:

-The house is not listed on a national, state or county registry of historic properties

- The CHP voted without deliberating.

-The decision to deny the application severely denies the property owner’s rights and there must be substantial evidence to support the decision. He said, “Any ambiguity in Village code must be supported by significant probative evidence and must be construed in the applicant’s favor. He cited a ruling by the trustees concerning the demolition of 53 Carman Road as precedent.

-He stated that the historic importance of the home is overly broad and vague.

-He argued that the house did not embody broad patterns of history or have high artistic value.

Dr. Emily Cooperman, who was retained by the applicants backed up Mahalek’s claims.

Speaking via Zoom she said, “Does it have high artistic value? Is it a really good design by a craftsman or a known architect OR crafted o exceptionally fine materials? High has to be exceptionally high? It certainly manifests period characteristics. It started out as a modest vernacular cottage but none of it rises to the level of high artistic values. It is relatively modest.” About the two additions on either side she said the building had acquired “accretions.”

She then turned to a discussion of the two small windows above the portico and explained that they are asymmetrical because were moved to accommodate two bathrooms. She then compared the house to 50 Woods Lane saying, “It’s a more intentional design with a careful choice of materials, stone – front and slate roof.”

She also added another criteria, saying, “It must be unique and stand out.” However Dolkart later explained that uniqueness was not in the Village code.

The appellants questioned the claim that the home reflected a pattern of suburbanization saying that suburbanization continues today… and that “historic preservation should not be simply because something is of an era.”

Professor Dolkart, who is an architectural historian retained by the Village of Scarsdale, also attended via Zoom. He was the primary author of the Cultural Reconnaissance Survey of Scarsdale and answered some of Cooperman’s statements.

He said:

-Whether or not a building is in the survey is irrelevant.

-There is nothing in the criteria that says a building has to be unique.

-We need to separate the suburbanization of Scarsdale from the general term suburbanization.

He then explained, “The preamble to our law asks you to consider things – not rate or judge. It is a series of things to consider including integrity of design, workmanship and location.

About the preservation of 27 Woods Lane he said, “Criteria 1 is most significant here – it is the broad pattern of history that I think is the most important. This is one of the first 4 houses in the Woods. It was built by the family that developed that developed the Woods and it sets the pattern for this subdivision that reflects these broad patterns of history. It is a Colonial Revival home, setback behind a deep lawn. It is significant within the pattern that created the Woods in Scarsdale.”

Dolkart added, “High artistic value does not mean it has to be sophisticated. It can be an interesting vernacular work of architecture.”

Quite a few residents of the Woods attended the hearing. Among them were Jim Detmer from 29 Woods Lane, his son Michael and his wife Heather Detmer from 2 Woods Lane and Detmer’s sister-in-law and her husband Eileen and Russel Lynch from Eastwoods Lane. All long time residents of the Woods, they are the modern day equivalent of the White family who built the Woods in the 1920’s. Jim Detmer and the neighbors expressed deep pride in their enclave.

Jordan Copeland and Lisa Copeland who live at 45 Woods Lane said the following:

“I urge the board to deny the appeal and reject the demolition permit under Village Code 182(5)(A)(1) and the preamble that 27 Woods Lane is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to broad patterns of Village history – specifically, Scarsdale’s major suburbanization of the 1920s and 30s.

First, it’s evident from all of the written histories of the village that this suburbanization is what made Scarsdale, Scarsdale. Now you’ve heard the argument tonight that it’s too broad, in that every house built in that era could be seen as associated with suburbanization? That is not correct — 27 Woods Lane is especially intertwined with and played a meaningful role in those events, and here’s how:

27 Woods Lane was built and resided in by the developer’s adult son, Clarence Smith Jr. Per village records, it was one of the very first homes built in the Woods development, maybe third or fourth, in 1924 or ‘25, and Smith chose a prominent double lot in the middle of the development and built a charming home. This showcased 27 Woods Lane as the featured centerpiece of the Woods. He did what a smart developer would do if you wanted to attract residents to the neighborhood and show builders how their homes should look and the quality they should strive for.

And that’s how 27 Woods Lane initiated what has remained an extraordinarily original neighborhood. If you look up the four streets of the Woods in the village’s online property records, you’ll find 66 homes. 59 of them were built between 1923 and 1937. 59 of 66 in the first 14 years. Just two more were built in 1941, two in the fifties, and three in the early 60s. The newest house in the Woods is now 60 years old.

It appears that no original home has ever been torn down and replaced. So what the Smith family developers did worked. 27 Woods Lane can be seen as the lynchpin to creating a neighborhood with an architectural cohesiveness, and it lasted, a unique time capsule of the important early suburban era.

But 27 Woods Lane can also be seen as representing an inflection point in the type of suburban homes built in Edgewood. The Woods was the last significant part of what is now Edgewood to be developed. You can see from the map on page 27 of the appeal materials that the lots in the Woods were planned larger than in the rest of Edgewood. This gave families in Edgewood who wanted a more spacious home but didn’t want to leave the elementary school a way to remain, thereby promoting community cohesiveness in Scarsdale. And as one of the very first homes in the Woods, 27 Woods Lane modeled this transition in Edgewood from smaller, more humble homes to a more aspirational suburb – which is exactly what Scarsdale soon became.

In historic preservation, we can focus narrowly on the architectural design of a home in isolation - who designed it and how it looks. But under the village code, we can also analyze the historic role that a house played and continues to play in the culture of Scarsdale. Because 27 Woods Lane was early, central and conspicuous in the Woods, it has affected far more people who have seen it every day for the last hundred years than a master-built mansion hidden away on an isolated piece of property.

So I urge you to uphold the CHP’s denial of the demolition permit. As you know, Edgewood is a more modest neighborhood than others in Scarsdale, and as such, is less likely to have homes designed by master architects and resided in by famous people. That said, the neighborhood is no less historic than any other, and under the code deserves the same historic protection when special homes like 27 Woods Lane merit it.”

Linda Killian of 1 Forest Lane said, “Scarsdale’s Village Code is focused on preserving historic elements of the Village, including neighborhoods representing accomplishments of our past.

Because of Scarsdale’s mostly agrarian nature until the late 19th century, much of Scarsdale history is as one of the planned suburban railroad developments that cluster around railroad stations throughout metropolitan New York and in a number of communities in the Midwest.

Scarsdale is an exemplar of this type of historic early 20th century development that enabled affluent families to escape the unhealthy environment of cities and bring up children in wholesome residential areas with single-family homes and directly shape their children’s public education.

Any student of American zoning is aware of the importance of these railroad suburbs in our past.”

She added, “What is historical? It does not have to be Monticello to be significant.”

Maura Lee of 19 Woods Lane said she has lived here since 2007 and grew up in Scarsdale. She said, “I believe that the CHP’s unanimous decision was correct. I disagree with the attorney’s readings of the statute and reconstructing it. In the Milstein case the judge found that the statute was NOT unconstitutionally vague. Just because we disagree it does not mean it was vague. The decision was not arbitrary or capricious. It was a well-informed decision.

James Detmer of 29 Woods Lane said, “There is a preponderance of reliable evidence to support the preservation of 27 woods lane. According to Dr. Andrew Dolkart, someone who is without peer, “The house retains integrity, location, design, setting and workmanship – the exact criteria for the Scarsdale code. Dolkart concludes 27 Woods Lane should NOT be demolished.”

Ann Marie Nee said she is a teacher of history at Scarsdale High School who lives in The Woods. She said a study of the area was one of the student’s favorite case studies on suburbanization the 1920’s and that the homes contribute collectively to the history of the area. She said, “I urge you to uphold the decision of the CHP.”

Mayor Justin Arest said the Board of Trustees would issue a decision by February 27, 2024.