Your Letters: Appeals From Walter Wadwick and Susan Levine
- Details
- Written by Joanne Wallenstein
- Hits: 377
See below for letters from Walter Wadwick, and Susan Levine:
Here is an appeal from Walter Wadwick, the former Manager of DeCicco’s in Scarsdale
Good Morning Joanne:
I was reaching out to you today to share with you and your readers that I suffered a stroke on May 15. After being in the hospital for one week I was released home to recover with lots of care and physical therapy each week. This has been a difficult situation for me both physically and mentally as my expenses are so much that I’m also struggling financially. I receive only a very little amount of disability payments. I was hoping you could share this with your readers in hopes they would understand and help with my go fund me page set up by a good friend on Facebook.
Thank you in advance for whatever you can do to help and support me.
Here is a link to my Go Fund Me page:
Walter Wadwick-DeCicco’s
Central Taxi Needs Your Support
To the Residents of Scarsdale and Edgemont:
Central Taxi is not out of business. They are very much alive and trying to survive.
They are operating from the Scarsdale Train Station area as usual seven days a week including nights. Well after midnight some nights.
They charge much less than Uber for the same ride and calling them at 914 723-0016 will bring a car to your door within a few minutes. Please do support this important local taxi service and spread the word that they are still serving our community as they have done for decades.
Susan Levine
It Will Always Be Greenacres
- Details
- Written by Joanne Wallenstein
- Hits: 526
On June 20th, Greenacres Elementary proudly celebrated the graduation of its 48 fifth-grade students in a heartfelt moving-up ceremony. Principal intern Karon Eldon warmly welcomed parents, families, and friends, setting the tone for a memorable morning. A special guest in attendance was former principal Sharon Hill, who returned to join the festivities after retiring in December 2024. Fifth-grade teachers Jeremy Guski and Heather McCarren had the honor of reading each student's name as they came forward to receive their certificates, marking the end of their elementary school journey.
Assistant Principal Sharon DeLorenzo then addressed the graduates and their families, recognizing the students’ growth, resilience, and accomplishments over their six years at Greenacres. Emotions ran high during a touching video montage, which paired kindergarten photos with current ones—reminding everyone just how far the students have come. The video ended with the words, “It will always be Greenacres or nowhere,” a message that resonated with the entire community. The students then sang the Greenacres School Song, proudly adding two new verses written by their class. The ceremony concluded with the presentation of the Paulie Strong Award by Mr. Guski, honoring former student Paul Ulysses Jimenez, who lost his courages battle of cancer in 2016. This year’s recipients, Nicole Shum and Ken Narahashi, were recognized for embodying the same spirit, leaving a lasting impression as the class of 2025 takes their next big forward.
Comments: Village Board Violated the Spirit, if not the Letter of the Open Meetings Law
- Details
- Written by Joanne Wallenstein
- Hits: 1231
Here are comments from Josh Frankel from the June 10, 2025 meeting of the Scarsdale Village Board
Good evening. Josh Frankel, Black Birch Lane.
I’d like to begin by thanking the Village Manager for correcting my misunderstanding regarding obtaining unanimous consent for the Flock mass surveillance resolution at the April 8 meeting. I appreciate her clarification, and I believe it's important to acknowledge that publicly.
It’s fascinating that for all the purported transparency, the Board got overwhelmingly negative feedback only tonight, after Joanne Wallenstein made the community aware of what transpired on April 8. Tonight’s meeting should have taken place in March.
A few issues I have raised remain unaddressed and I can only make negative inferences from the Board’s unresponsiveness. So, in ascending order of importance:
First, on April 22 I raised the concern, via an article in The Guardian, of widespread abuses of a similar technology right here in Westchester County. On May 22, the Mayor wrote to me: “Regarding the Guardian article, I had said we would investigate, and we did. It appears the article was inaccurate, at least as it pertains to Westchester County.” I have repeatedly asked for specifics about the alleged “inaccuracies” and have heard nothing. I remain in touch with the Guardian reporter, who has assured me multiple times that there was no pushback on her piece. I’d note 404Media recently wrote about ICE using Flock’s data.
Second, a boilerplate document was circulated among community leaders in mid-March seeking their signatures in support of the Village’s acquisition of this technology. It remains unclear, at least for now, how much earlier this initiative was in the hopper. Why was no effort ever made to engage with the community?
Finally, the vague and opaque framing of the April 8 Work Session clearly violated the spirit, if not the letter, of the Open Meetings Law, which leads to the single most important issue: The rushed introduction of the Flock resolution and subsequent vote on April 8 remain extremely troubling. The Open Meetings Law requires that documents scheduled for discussion, very much including resolutions, be made available to the public at least 24 hours before the meeting “to the extent practicable.” So, again, what, specifically, made it impracticable to provide the requisite notice? Why was this matter not held over until the April 22nd meeting, when the public would have had time to review and respond? What could not have waited another two weeks? This matter is, or was, deserving of a full and thorough public airing and, instead, got none.
From this initiative’s unknown beginnings, to the failure to solicit any public input whatsoever, to the woefully inadequate framing of the April 8 Work Session, to the urgent need to vote on the resolution that same night, to the refusal to answer very straightforward questions, this process has been a shameful masterclass in opacity and poor governance and an indelible stain on this Board’s legacy.
This is not about being anti-technology. It's about respecting process, respecting the public, and remembering that a healthy democracy doesn’t run on shortcuts or, for that matter, ignoring constituents.
I continue to look forward to clear, concise, non-evasive answers to my questions.
Thank you.
Trustees Review Proposal to Require Licensing for Tree Contractors
- Details
- Written by Joanne Wallenstein
- Hits: 813
A few weekends ago I took a walk around the neighborhood and saw a mountain of shrubs, trees, leaves and roots piled along the street. The greenery had been chopped up, roots and all, and were amassed in a huge heap. Basically, all the greenery in the front yard had been removed to make way for new plantings.
In the pile I saw some large tree trunks but I had no idea if the work had been done legally and if the residents had a permit. Not wanting to police my neighbors I moved on.
Though current law allows the removal of two trees per year, a permit is needed. Often those without permission take trees down after hours or on weekends to avoid scrutiny. So the question is, how can the Village enforce these laws and bar the removal of trees without a permit?
One proposal was vetted at a work session of the Village Board on June 17, 2025.
Trustees discussed adding a licensing requirement for companies that perform tree cutting, pruning and removal in Scarsdale. The intent of the law is to be sure that licensed contractors familiarize themselves with Scarsdale’s tree laws and will make them accountable for violating the laws. Those who do will have their licenses suspended or revoked.
If police see work in progress they can stop any work being done if the contractor cannot display a decal to show that they are licensed.
The new ordinance could limit work hours to 8 am to 6 pm on weekdays and 10 am to 5 pm on weekends. After discussion, the Board proposed barring any tree work on weekends because it is difficult to enforce the law and it would prevent noise.
The proposed law suggests a fine of $750 -$2,000 for a first conviction and $1,000 - $5,000 for a subsequent conviction. The Attorney also suggested that the tree license of a violator could be suspended or revoked. See the proposed code here:
During the discussion Trustee Goldschmidt asked, “What are we trying to solve? I am all for making sure bad actors don’t take down trees. But I don’t want to make life difficult for someone who wants to prune a tree. Why should the resident have to go to a licensed tree vendor? I think we should narrow the proposed law.”
Deputy Mayor Gruenberg asked Superintendent Coleman, “Can your department give the police a list of people with open tree permits each Friday – so that the police know who has a permit to do work?”
Coleman said, “Even if they have a permit it’s hard to know how many trees they took down legally or illegally.”
Joan Weissman of 3 Kingston Road said, “This is a great step in the right direction however without enforcement it will not be effective. The licensing is good – but there should be enforcement.”
Michelle Sterling of 6 Brayton Road said, “I appreciate the proposal and I am in favor of it.
Keep the registration fee low so we can get people to register. It is duplicative of what they have to file with the county. I would like to keep the tree definition to what we have now. Stick with the definition of a tree that is widely used. I am in favor of stiff penalties. They should pay a fine. I like the idea to give the police a list of people who have tree permits, weekly.”
She suggested, “Why don’t we have no tree removals on the weekends? People don’t want to hear tree removals on the weekends.”
Madelaine Eppenstein of18 Autenreith said, “I think it is unreasonable to expect landscapers and arborists to understand the code. I don’t expect people with chain saws to have read the code. I don’t think the workers will understand the code. There is already a penalty for the homeowner for a permit violation.”
Marian Greene of 43 Butler Road said, “Do people need permits to prune trees?”
Susan Douglass said, “I think no weekend work is a great idea.”
Susan Levine of Ardmore Road agreed, saying “It’s a good idea because police don’t come out on the weekend. Give us peace on the weekends.”
At the conclusion of the discussion the Village Attorney said he would draft some clarifications regarding tree pruning and enforcement procedures. He said, “I think there is consensus to move forward.”
Architectural Historian Recommends Preservation of Colonial Revival Home
- Details
- Written by Joanne Wallenstein
- Hits: 1381
Sometimes a house does not need to be large or grand to save it from demolition. Homes that meet the criteria for preservation under Scarsdale’s Historic Preservation Code do not have to be manses or stately Tudors. They can be modest but still qualify for preservation.
One such home in question is a modest Colonial Revival built in the 1930’s in the Heathcote Crest area of Scarsdale at the corner of Graham and Lawrence Roads. Though you might not notice it when you drive by, an analysis of the home and it’s provenance reveals that it exemplifies a broad pattern of Scarsdale history, was designed by a known architect and possesses “high artistic value.”
After an application was filed by Westchester Modular Homes LLC to demolish the home – and presumably replace it with a modular home -- the Scarsdale Committee for Historic Preservation asked Architectural Historian Andrew Dolkart for his assessment.
In an opinion filed this month, Dolkart did some research and concluded that a permit to demolish the home should be denied.
Why?
Dolkart found that the house was designed by architect L.S. Beardsley and built in 1930 by the Westchester County Small Estate Corporation in a new development called Heathcote Crest. Dolkart says, “The Heathcote Crest development was part of the significant movement that changed the character of Scarsdale from a rural area into one of the prime suburbs of New York City,” and says, “this transformation of Scarsdale is, indeed, the most significant issue in the broad pattern of Scarsdale’s history.”
The house was a part of “a new movement in residential building called the “small estates” idea. The objective was to build houses in the best neighborhoods where real estate values would be maintained; to design building, “regardless of price,” that would have “beauty, individuality and utility,” and that “every material from cellar to roof, inside and out, must be a product of known excellence.”
About the design of the home, Dolkart notes it is a “Colonial Revival,” with irregular shingles designed to look as if they have been handcut. He notes that the rear of the house is “marked by a double gable in the manner of several seventeenth-century New England houses, such as the Whipple House in Ipswich, Mass.”
As the house has undergone only minor changes he believes it could be easily repaired.
Dolkart concludes that the home meets two and possible three criteria for preservation:
-It represents a broad pattern of Village history.
-It was designed by a talented and innovative architect
-It is a distinctive example of a small-scale Colonial Revival design that has high artistic value.
He therefore recommends that the Committee for Historic Preservation deny the application to demolish 53 Graham Road, saying “The neighborhood would be seriously compromised if it were lost."
See his opinion and photos here:
The application to demolish the home was adjourned from the May 2025 meeting but is on the agenda for consideration at the June 17 meeting of the Committee for Historic Preservation at 7 pm at Scarsdale Village Hall.
