Details

Written by Joanne Wallenstein

Published: 06 June 2017

Created: 06 June 2017

Last Updated: 06 June 2017

Hits: 7060

This is a letter to the editor from Jennifer Hu and Tony Corriggio:
Several months ago, Dr. Hagerman asked Greenacres and all of Scarsdale to "pause" and allow the new architects to analyze the alternatives for Greenacres school and report back to the community. We as a community upheld our part of the bargain. However, on May 22nd we were presented with a shockingly incomplete proposal -- just one choice for Greenacres-- a renovation with the children inside. It was readily apparent to all who attended that no other alternatives were researched or even considered.

All taxpayers should be appalled that the Administration did not complete even the most basic level of due diligence when considering an expenditure of this size, sensitivity, and complexity. Renovating with the children in place will be exorbitantly expensive if done in accordance with the letter of the law, and will likely give Scarsdale taxpayers a far inferior product for the money spent. This is a 100 year investment and long term investments need to be evaluated not just on upfront costs but on expected benefits over time. If the Administration had performed a thoughtful and thorough analysis as promised, then perhaps we could have accepted this proposed course of action. But none of us should accept this.

After three years of "studying" this issue, the Administration has not communicated any details about the costs/benefits of different potential alternatives. It appears that the Administration is afraid that if they do the analysis and present a new school option as part of the bond consideration, that Scarsdale residents may vote it down. So the new architects only delivered an answer that palliates that fear. And further – the plan is being packaged with an indecent proposal to buy your votes with new "cubbies, kitchens and cafeterias" for all the schools. For decades, Greenacres has supported other schools' needs with the promise that they would be the focus of this upcoming bond. Scarsdale residents deserve an analysis why an expensive, incomplete and disruptive band-aid for Greenacres should be the choice when numerous consultants have recommended that a new school option be explored.

We should all realize that Scarsdale's "brand" is educational excellence, not appeasement and mediocrity. People don't pay Scarsdale real estate prices for views of a field or extra storage space in their schools. They expect that Scarsdale will be striving to provide the absolute best in facilities and instruction for their children. Scarsdale's neighborhoods have always supported each others' needs in defense of this brand. The current proposal severely dilutes that brand, and represents yet another poorly conceived plan for Scarsdale involving large sums of taxpayer dollars.

Ask the Administration to do the right thing for the children and your tax dollars and at least properly evaluate the alternatives. This decision has long lasting ramifications for the Scarsdale community as a whole. Please make your voices heard at the Board of Education meeting on June 12th.

Jennifer Hu & Tony Corriggio
Brite Avenue

Details

Written by Joanne Wallenstein

Published: 13 June 2017

Created: 13 June 2017

Last Updated: 14 June 2017

Hits: 7597

(Updated on 6-14) With the prospect of an extensive renovation spanning three summers at Greenacres School, parents with children who would be in the school during the renovation turned out in force to speak at a school board meeting on Monday night June 12. Though the Board of Education's last meeting of the year already had a lengthy agenda, everyone who came was given the opportunity to speak for three minutes. The comment period preceded a presentation from architects BBS in which they ultimately proposed renovations to the interior of the hundred year-old school along with two additions, one on Putnam Avenue and the other on Huntington Avenue.

These parents with young children along with other residents spoke at length to the board and the superintendents, presenting their reasons for favoring a new school.

Below are excerpts from their comments along with several from those who favor the renovation of the existing school:

Jon Krisbergh of Greenacres Avenue made a lengthy statement. He said, "I have done a lot of thinking over the past several weeks about Greenacres. To be honest, as you probably know from my writing and previous comments here, I got involved in this issue because I have serious concerns with the safety of the children with a renovation that keeps the kids in place. I have also highlighted what I think are the shortfalls of the various proposals for renovation. And while those things remain relevant to me, I realized that the reason I am so devoted to this has transformed. I really have come to understand and believe that this is a once in a life opportunity that we - you, me, Scarsdale - have to do something exceptional and to leave our mark of excellence on our schools and community. We have the chance to not only help Greenacres, but to pursue a project that is inspirational, innovative, and a source of pride for all of Scarsdale.

It seems that we are putting a lot effort into justifying an inadequate renovation. The new tack of saying well, Greenacres is just as bad as other schools misses the point – and places us, as a district, in a race to the bottom. That is NOT Scarsdale. And the problem is that there is so much noise around this issue, the community-at-large can't understand what is happening and those of us who are engaged are stuck in trench-warfare stuck with our thinking buried in the weeds.

But take a step back. Go back three years, five years, ten years, people were excited about the 2019 bond which would allow for a major project at Greenacres that would transform the school into a modern facility. Even the B design - though it turned out not to be the case - was sold as something that would be as good as a new school. Now, we are proposing leaving most of the school as is and merely cramming some extra space on to the building.

Instead of spending money in an ill-fated attempt to keep our schools at barely functional, let's do something exciting and great. Think of what we can do if we gave a grade-A architect the freedom to create a model school with the thinking of all of the best practices of current educational pedagogy and structural engineering – there is no longer talk of greatness; only "trust us, this will make Greenacres as bad as the second worst school in the District."

Let's take the model program and design a school that really works. A new school could easily meet or exceed those requirements. With classrooms that not only have space for full programming but the latest technology built in with flexibility for the next generation of advancements. Socket-placement should not constrain our ability to provide our students with the latest and greatest technology. Real maker space designed from the beginning to be used in that capacity instead of retrofitting other space.

Let's bring the schools up to code - not because GA is worse than other schools but because it's the right thing to do and because we have the opportunity to do so. Build a school with great and new infrastructure that not only saves costs but saves the planet. We can design a school with sustainable design in mind. The previous proposal included a geo thermal heating and cooling system. I mean, wow! So, we can address the current demand for AC in the schools and do it in a cost-effective and environmentally friendly way. Why are we not shouting this from the mountaintop!?

Inspired by last night's Tony's, I'll leave you with some lines from a popular historical show:

Legacy. What is a legacy?
It's planting seeds in a garden you never get to see
You let us make a difference
A place where we can leave our fingerprints and rise up
Wise up. Eyes up.

I pose to you all the question of what you want your legacy to be. Members of the Board, what do you want your legacy from your time on the School Board to be. Dr Hagerman, what do you want your legacy to be? An exceptional school or a failed and inadequate renovation that may harm our children only to have to spend more on Greenacres in the future. Please put a new school option back on the table so that you can leave your fingerprints on our schools and all of Scarsdale can Rise Up! "

Former Village Trustee Bill Stern of Rural Drive said he was "disappointed that the survey did not explore the building of a new school." He pulled out a guide from the EPA called, the "Sensible Guide for Healthier School Renovation," and said it would be a folly to renovate a school with lead paint, radon PCB's and asbestos hidden in the walls. He said the indoor air would be compromised and leave children susceptible to environmental hazards. He said, "I would rather you raise my taxes and build a LEED certified building that would be a benchmark of what Scarsdale stands for.

Speaking for the League of Women Voters of Scarsdale, Linda Doucette Ashman posed questions about the process of determining what would be build asking who was involved? What decisions were made and when will this information be available to the public? Who were the experts and were teachers and students consulted? What led to the determination that Greenacres should be renovated without presenting the option for a new school?

Lynn Marvin, the immediate past president of the Greenacres PTA said she has a 1st and 3rd grader in the school and one entering kindergarten in the fall. About the school she said, "I don't think the options and analysis are out there. We want that analysis done. To say the noise and dust during a renovation will not impact the kids is crazy. What about traffic safety? The only green space around the school is Putnam Road where the addition will be. Where are kids going to wait to be picked up? Where will the construction equipment be? I think these decisions should be made collaboratively. Please look at that seriously – raise our taxes – lets innovate! People will get on board."

Speaking as chair of the LWVS committee on facilities, Mary Beth Evans said, "How will the survey responses be reliably used? What educational philosophy and pedagogical goals inform the proposal? What research will be used to define the criteria? What elementary school design research will be used? What are the district's plan for outreach to Greenacres residents and the wider community?

Brittany Harris of 4 Windmill Circle explained that she had just closed on her house that took 2.5 years to build. She said she was recently at kindergarten orientation at Greenacres and was "Blown away by the teachers and the staff. " She said, "I hope we can provide the facility they deserve. How will my daughter learn she is entering kindergarten. The construction will be a disruption to routine. I am not convinced that this is okay."

Brad Cetron of Oxford Road said he has two little kids and is "frustrated at the lack of transparency and vision." He said, "I hoped to have a facts and data-driven conversation. Instead, the prospect of a new school was summarily dismissed. BBS says we will leave the children in the school during the renovation where they will be exposed to asbestos, mercury, mold, and sealants. The EPA Guide says that "Children are especially susceptible to environment hazards. I have long been a proponent of architectural preservation – but I see a stronger case for a new building. I implore you to consider a new building. We need a 21st century Greenacres. We are looking to you to provide the vision for a superior education and the vision to bring it about."

Deborah Benzel of Brookby Road said, "We have lost sight of what is important. We are spending money on other schools that are not a priority and are not desired. Facility investment does not need to be equal across all schools. We should not miss our chance to build a new school. Squeezing 15 more years out of a school is not fiscally responsible. It doesn't make sense to put a bandaid on now. A new school is innovative and moves all of Scarsdale forward."

Pam Rubin of Cohawney Road spoke on behalf of herself and Diane Greenwald. She said, "We would support a bond just devoted to Greenacres and we would support a new school. As a member of the building steering committee for the 2014 bond we made a commitment to invest in Greenacres. It is their turn and it is fair. The last bond was developed through a robust process. We are confused by the BBS concept of commons space – which seems more appropriate for high school than elementary school. At Greenacres, water issues will forever be a problem and the site is limited. It continues to be reasonable to consider a new school as an option. Let's stay open to the option of something new. Show us something that makes sense and meets our education values." See her full remarks here:

J Rahmani of Sage Terrace said he was a research analyst covering commercial real estate. He said, "all properties face obsolescence and there comes a time when replacement makes sense. The current analysis is short sighted. The community will react – people will take their kids out and put them in private schools."

Laura O'Connel of Brewster Road said "I am devastated, angry and frustrated. My son cannot be in the school under renovation. I moved here for the excellence that Scarsdale is -- I thought we were promised a proposal for a new school – I don't think a renovation makes sense. Where is that proposal? I will not be sending my son there and I think I am in big company. I will not support the bond. I am disappointed that my child does not come first. Why subject our children to this?"

Nathan Boynton of Brite Avenue said, "I share the frustration. I see an attempt to create a predetermined outcome. I am willing to hear it out but my kids will not go there when its renovated. That's very frustrating because that's why we came here. All the things before in the engineering report have now been dismissed. You need to be prepared – people won't show up."

Laura Greenfield of 15Windmill Lane said she is a new resident with two young children. She explained that she is a full time working mom who works on financing construction projects, managing $4 billion in loans." She said, "I finance renovations and ground up construction and know that renovations often have major cost overruns. The contingencies you show are inadequate – there are often cost overrun of 30-40% for renovations. I don't like to visit building sites because accidents happen. We can't take that chance here. We moved here for the schools – lets make the facility innovative too."

Jade Romani of Sage Terrace said, my kids are 4 and 6. We chose this town because I believed it was the best educational system in Westchester. We have a great opportunity to build a state of the art facility – it will benefit all of Scardsale, not just Greenacres."

Judith Schiamberg of Elm Road explained that between herself and her two sisters they had 8 children in the Scarsdale Schools. Her grandfather was the architect for the Heathcote School and he was committed to seeing a building that would be an education jewel. She said that as a teacher she works in a building that has been cobbled together and is not flexible, causing a scramble for space.... Saying "the building could not consider what the future would hold." She said, "I want to see a proposal for a new school. I don't want to see my kids in cobbled together space."

Adam Vivo recently signed a contract to move to Greenacres Avenue with his five year-old and 18 month-old children. He said, "I am coming here because of a dedication to education. I was surprised to find that the new school was off the table. I am a parent and a child psychologist. Think about what's in the best interest of the children. How could this be in their best interest? Look at both of these options and think of an option that telegraphs into the future."

Mona Longman said "My kids are out of the schools. They were there when the multipurpose room was built and the new classrooms were added. The school is hemmed in on three sides by the road – and on one side by houses. All the other schools have park-like settings and could expand. Greenacres has always been locked in. It has curb appeal now – what is it going to look like? An eyesore that will affect the neighborhoods? Lack of options has always been a problem. We have the opportunity to move it across the street – where there are options down the road. We have to look long term."

Kyle Shirley questioned the contingencies in the proposals that were the same for both new construction and the renovation. He said, "There's a problem with credibility. People are deeply suspicious."

Harriet Sobol said "It has taken a long time. It's hard to make a decision. Though I am not affected personally I do have a strong feelings about education. Thank you Bill Stern – he spoke for me. I first worked here in Scarsdale as a student teacher in Fox Meadow. These schools became the standard by which I measure all schools. 60 years after it was built, the Heathcote School is a show place for education. I hope you do build a new school. Start with everyone being together. I know it's hard for those who lose but that's the way democracy works.

Amy Hosseinbukus said "I am in favor of a new school. Why was the decision made to take a new school off the table? I thought it was shameful. If you are going to decide not to build a new school you should be proud of your decision and explain why you did it....A new school will last – there's really not a question. We want a comparative analysis. Lets see the real numbers and we will get behind it. I am heartened by all of Scarsdale that comes to these meetings."

Raf Ezratty of 97 Garden Road said, "We need to look at the cost benefits. Equity is ridiculous. Everyone knows – we don't have to kid everyone! What is the most optimal situation? I haven't heard about closing the street. Let's look at it from a business standpoint – it is really hard to imagine that we can't close Huntington Avenue. If we need to fight the state, we can do it. We can make a lot of people happy.

Anne Moretti, a realtor and an empty nester who lives in Heathcote said, "Our educational system is what outsiders value most. All of my buyers were drawn here for the quality of the education and the schools -- they come for the schools and stay because of the community. When prospective buyers visit Scarsdale we show off the library and the pool, but the schools are their number one priority. In the proposal, I have not seen anything about educational excellence and how we will achieve this. We are on a quest to stay on the cutting edge. I am in competition with other communities every day. I am asked about schools, technologies, access to computers, language instruction. My question to you is what model 21st century elementary schools were visited or explored online to inform your perspective on what was needed for Greenacres? And can you share that list with the community to better form our perspective on the current proposal? Note that our Library Board, in order to inform it's vision and plan design, visited countless libraries all over the region to get a sense of what was being done by others.

Some waited until the end of the presentation and board discussion to speak which was well after 11 pm.

Ron Schulhof said "I want to comment on the process over the summer. As a resident and a voter I am uncomfortable about how we will get to a decision in just three months. We need more time – this is a $60 million bond. In December, I will need to feel that it was thought through."

Tony Corrigio of Brite Avenue agreed with Ron on the timing. He said, "We have questions based on what we heard tonight. In the last weeks over 300 people asked you to properly evaluate a fully loaded renovation vs. a new school. It's $38 million for the renovation – without the cost of trailers. We're comparing $40 million to an analysis for a new school that is based on one square footage number. We all know there are economies of scale that come from building a big project. We really need to understand the numbers. Think about the energy and maintenance savings of a new building. We have this one time opportunity to build a new school. We must have these numbers out in the community looking at 30-50 years.

Chris Marvin of Elm Road said that the information flow has been lacking. He said, "I think in an ideal world the PTA would represent parents. We have received no information from the PTA. This is not the way it should work. It sounds like cost has become the only factor that is considered. There are certain issues with the site that can only be solved with a new building. The pick up and drop off around the building does not work. This can be fixed with a new building. I was disturbed to see 25 parking places on the blacktop adjacent to the playground. Shocking. I don't understand how the kids will be moved back and forth. There are a lot of logistics that need to be figured out up front. You can't wait for the construction manager. Please ask those questions. If you look at the aerial photo, there is nowhere to put anything. Now it's a three-year project. Kids will spend half their years in and around construction. If the cost of the renovation is $30 million you need to add in the $8 million in deferred maintenance costs."

Andy Taylor of Walworth Avenue said "Scarsdale has old schools. What is the useful life of all these facilities – what is their lifespan and when should their replacement be considered? What are your goals? We don't understand them. I can't understand spending $30 million for a building with no A/C, that cannibalizes the basketball courts and relies on dehumidifiers in the basement. If you want to do a renovation do it the Scarsdale way – move the kids out and do the renovation. The financing analysis has been glossed over. It addresses the cost differential. I hope we learn more, but so far, based on what I have heard today I will vote down the bond as it is currently construed. Four years of construction over three years is just too much.

Some were in favor of the proposed renovation and maintaining the field. Valerie Greenberg of 121 Brite Avenue said she "supports the plan" which she called "elegant and grounded in facts." She said that "this year is the 100th anniversary of the stunning high school" where all additions have been built "around the kernel of the past." She said that Greenacres should be preserved and renovated, saying "this is what great institutions like Oxford and Cambridge do. We have been told that the renovations will be done safely and minimize disruption. This has always been the case but for some reason parents refuse to ignore the precedent of safe renovation. Let's continue with the BBS proposal that preserves our beautiful, sturdy, older schools."

Marnie Gelfman, also of Brite Avenue agreed, saying that her husband Peter graduated from the school and that she teaches art there. She said, "We all support the renovation and expansion of the school and the effort to save the field."

Leslie Shearer of Brewster Road said, "The architects say we don't need a new school. Many who are standing up her have renovated their own homes. Yes Greenacres has a bathroom that needs to be redone. But think about needs vs. wants. We have a sound building. If we kick the can down the road your children will not reap the benefits.

Sue Zhou of Montrose Road said, "Renovate the school. We love the school. There are wonderful teachers. It does need air conditioning and there are other issues. We want our kids to be safe. But as a community I feel we love the field."

Madelaine Hauptman said "I live next to the field. The field is a swamp. If you build a school there you will probably have to surround it in concrete. I think you chose wonderful architects. They seem to want to make an outstanding school in a cost effective way. You need to address the fears of the parents. I think you can create an environment that is healthy for the children. There are 700 people like us that think the field should be preserved. It is utilized all the time. You can preserve the character of the building."

Xu Sue of Kingston Road supports a renovation. She said, "I know there is a group of parents in Greenacres who are strongly advocating for a new school. I believe their concern is the children's safety. I think those worries are understandable. Can you study the cost of trailers? Building a new school would not be supported by the whole Scarsdale. I strongly support renovation/expansion."

Barbara Wenglin said "I would like to address the process. Proponents for a new school came to the party two years late. Public forums have taken place.... A preserve the field petition remains active along with the signatures. The district has undertaken renovations though out the years... the new architects made a proposal for a safe renovation. It is an innovative sustainable option. If we continue to debate we risk losing the opportunity for the bond.

Robert Berg said, "I am not here to speak on the merits of the proposal as we don't have the information to make that decision. You are not providing the community with the information we need. The survey was a good idea but you need to get out into the community more. Reach out to the broader community. The survey does not give you the full picture."

Andrew Sereysky, President of the Greenacres Neighborhood Association again invited the Superintendent to come to a community meeting in Greenacres, to lay out the options and answer questions.

Details

Written by Joanne Wallenstein

Published: 22 May 2017

Created: 22 May 2017

Last Updated: 22 May 2017

Hits: 3906

This article is sponsored content submitted by Advocate Brokerage of Scarsdale:
We were saddened to hear of the Queen's house fire at the end of April that claimed the lives of 5 young people. The fast moving fire was said to be reported by a driver passing the home. Although firefighters responded within four minutes of receiving the call, they were unable to save the lives of any of the 5 victims. It was also reported that there were no working smoke detectors in the home.

According to the NFPA (National Fire Protection Agency) 3 of every 5 home fire deaths occur in homes that have no smoke detectors.

The same week and a bit closer to home, another quick moving fire raged in Briarcliff Manor, where a smoke detector went off at around 1:30am, alerting the sleeping family. All three residents were able to escape to safety. Although this time, the fire claimed no lives; the home burned before firefighters could save it and the home was later declared a total loss.

Last year over $7 Billion dollars in damage was reported due to home fires.

In December 2016, Scarsdale experienced its own fatal fire that claimed the life of Dr. John Salimbene on his 85th birthday. His wife Marie made it out of the house and was treated at the scene before being taken to Westchester Medical Center. The home reportedly had no central station fire alarm.

We hear all too often of house fires that claim lives and destroy homes because they had no working smoke detectors and/or no central station fire alarms.

Security companies install central station fire alarms to provide monitoring services. Once installed, a home is typically monitored 24 hours a day, 7 days a week for fire as well as intrusion. The advantage of this type of service is that in the event of a fire (or attempted break in) the appropriate authorities are notified quickly.

In many cases neighbors report fires, however this results in a time gap between when the fire actually starts and when it is reported. If the home is located on an isolated street or if it is in the middle of the night, the time gap can be significant. When it comes to fire, time is not on your side. Each minute that passes can be the difference between life and death, between a home that is damaged and a home that is lost.

It is also important to note that most insurance companies provide a significant discount for the proper installation of a central station fire and burglar alarm system.

Questions? Call Advocate at 914-723-7100. A central station alarm can save your family's life and home.